A picture may be worth far more than a thousand words in today’s partisan political climate; consider this:
As Stephen Johnson reports about the 2018 mid-term elections:
• Women and nonwhite candidates made record gains in the 2018 midterms.
• In total, almost half of the newly elected Congressional representatives are not white men.
• Those changes come almost entirely from Democrats; Republican members-elect are all white men except for one woman.
This image triggered for me an important realization about equity and the persistence of inequity. Consider next the inequitable representation, historical and current, in the U.S. Senate:
Stacey Jones also details about Fortune 500 CEOs that “[o]f those high ranking officials, 80% are men and 72% of those men are white”; for example:
These pie charts are important, I think, because they help us confront the zero-sum game thinking that impacts people with inequitable access to power: white men.
An equitable Senate would have 30–40 white men; an equitable distribution of CEOs would be about the same percentage, 30–40%.
So here is the trap — in order to reach equity, the current power structure must change and those with current inequitable power will perceive they have lost something substantial, something they believe they have earned. In fact, however, what they must lose is privilege, unfair advantages.
Is equity a zero-sun game? I think not, but it certainly must feel that way to those with the current status quo of power because, as the recent gains among Democrats shows, when we move toward equity of power, the demographics change, primarily with a reduction of white men.
The failure of zero-sum game thinking is deeply partisan, as Danielle Kurtzleben explains:
Exit polls also showed wide partisan gaps in views of gender. An overwhelming majority of Americans, nearly 8 in 10, said it’s important to elect more women to public office. Among those who consider that “important,” two-thirds voted for Democrats. Meanwhile, more than 8 in 10 of those who consider that “not important” voted for Republicans.
This gap suggests that Republicans attract those who perceive moving toward equity as a loss for the the inequitable status quo.
The tide that must turn is when we all can agree that equity expanding is a net gain for everyone, especially as we move toward our positions of power reflecting more closely those over whom they have that power.